One time, we were in Bulacan shooting one of the Shake, Rattle & Roll episodes. We were both seated in our directors’ chairs in the middle of a vast rice field under the light of a full moon that turned the waters around us into silver. We were waiting for the lighting set-up to be finished and this, as you know, can take hours in open fields. And there we were with our feet soaking in bangus-infested waters drinking coffee and discussing Sondheim, Monty Python, Mick Jagger and Philip Glass. Escudero would point out at intervals Aldebaran, Cassiopeia and the Pleiades just as Joel Torre did in Oro and he told me, “Peque, isn’t this the life? Where else in the world does anybody have a chance at this? To be sitting in the most unexpected places in the Philippines in the most unexpected hours of the day and talking? Talking and soaking it all in. It doesn’t get any better than this.”
via “Courage in the face of mediocrity.” A eulogy for Don Escudero by Peque Gallaga | JessicarulestheUniverse.
rePost::QOTD::go out and write your own story, or you’ll just be a character in someone else’s.
go out and write your own story, or you’ll just be a character in someone else’s.
via Why founding a three-person startup with zero revenue is better than working for Goldman Sachs. | AdGrok.
rePost::Why Scrum will never work « Maurits thinks aloud
The secret is to treasure the people who do their best and not the least they could do. I’m lucky to say that most of my teammates are like this.
Reason 2: according to Scrum ‘people do the best they can’ if you give them enough freedom. What the hell is this based upon? They don’t. They will probably do the least they can because in general most software developers are underpaid, especially compared to their managers. That’s why they want to become managers or software architects as soon as possible, since they can then still be lazy without anyone noticing and the added bonus that they are getting better paid.
via Why Scrum will never work « Maurits thinks aloud.
furbo.org · The Rise and Fall of the Independent Developer
I have this suspicion that long term the rising cost of innovation because of the broken ip/patent system is going to be more costly than the rising cost of healthcare in the us. If we factor in the lost innovation because of these patent trolls. Down with the patent trolls.
But this expanded distribution is also putting our business at risk: there are people in this new market who claim a right to a part our hard work. Either by patent or copyright infringement, developers are finding this new cost of litigation to be onerous.
The scary part is that these infringements can happen with any part of our products or websites: things that you’d never imagine being a violation of someone else’s intellectual property. It feels like coding in a mine field.
From our experience, it’s entirely possible that all the revenue for a product can be eaten up by legal fees. After years of pouring your heart and soul into that product, it’s devastating. It makes you question why the hell you’re in the business: when you can’t pay salaries from product sales, there’s no point in building it in the first place.
So, just as in the days of magnetic media, the independent developer now finds him or herself at a point where it is again becoming very expensive to distribute their products to a mass market. This time the retail channel itself is very cheap, but the ancillary costs, both financially and emotionally, are very high.
And, of course, only large companies and publishers can bear these costs. My fear is that It’s only a matter of time before developers find the risks and expenses prohibitive and retreat to the safety of a larger organization. We’ll be going back to square one.
Over the years many of the top selling apps have been created by independent developers, starting with Steve Dementer and Trism at the App Store launch, and continuing to this day with titles like Tiny Wings by Andreas Illiger.
Losing that kind of talent and innovation to a legal system is the real crime.
via furbo.org · The Rise and Fall of the Independent Developer.
LSS :: Samson By Regina Spektor
Love this song.
Samson
You are my sweetest downfall
I loved you first, I loved you first
Beneath the sheets of paper lies my truth
I have to go, I have to go
Your hair was long when we first met
Samson went back to bed
Not much hair left on his head
He ate a slice of Wonderbread
And went right back to bed
And history books forgot about us
And the Bible didn’t mention us
The Bible didn’t mention us, not even once
You are my sweetest downfall
I loved you first , I loved you first
Beneath the stars came falling on our heads
But they’re just old light
They’re just old light
Your hair was long when we first met
Samson came to my bed
Told me that my hair was red
Told me I was beautiful and came into my bed
I cut his hair myself one night
A pair of dull scissors and the yellow light
He told me that I’d done all right
And kissed me until the morning light, the morning light
And he kissed me until the morning light
Samson went back to bed
Not much hair left on his head
Ate a slice of Wonderbread
And went right back to bed
We couldn’t break the columns down
No, we couldn’t destroy a single one
And the history books forgot about us
And the Bible didn’t mention us
Not even once
You are my sweetest downfall
I loved you first
Stoya's Bookclub
Loved Reading This::The Good Short Life With A.L.S. – NYTimes.com
Do yourself a favor read the whole damn thing.
There is no meaningful treatment. No cure. There is one medication, Rilutek, which might make a few months’ difference. It retails for about $14,000 a year. That doesn’t seem worthwhile to me. If I let this run the whole course, with all the human, medical, technological and loving support I will start to need just months from now, it will leave me, in 5 or 8 or 12 or more years, a conscious but motionless, mute, withered, incontinent mummy of my former self. Maintained by feeding and waste tubes, breathing and suctioning machines.
¶ No, thank you. I hate being a drag. I don’t think I’ll stick around for the back half of Lou.
¶ I think it’s important to say that. We obsess in this country about how to eat and dress and drink, about finding a job and a mate. About having sex and children. About how to live. But we don’t talk about how to die. We act as if facing death weren’t one of life’s greatest, most absorbing thrills and challenges. Believe me, it is. This is not dull. But we have to be able to see doctors and machines, medical and insurance systems, family and friends and religions as informative — not governing — in order to be free.
¶ And that’s the point. This is not about one particular disease or even about Death. It’s about Life, when you know there’s not much left. That is the weird blessing of Lou. There is no escape, and nothing much to do. It’s liberating.
via The Good Short Life With A.L.S. – NYTimes.com.
Elink Video :: chris rock – a job and a career
UPDATE::better video follows
One of the best answers to Why Google+ not Facebook?::7 Reasons Why Google+ Will Succeed (and 1 reason why it will very likely fail)
Google+ doesn’t want to pull anyone into a walled-garden the way Facebook wants. Instead, they want to go with us wherever we go. It’s subtle, but it’s clear. Facebook is saying, “come do what you need to do here,” while Google+ is saying, ‘take us with you and let us help you with what you need to do wherever you need to do it.”
via 7 Reasons Why Google+ Will Succeed (and 1 reason why it will very likely fail).
Something similar to Dave Winer’s “People come back to places that send them away“
rePost::Schumpeter: Too much information | The Economist
They raise three big worries. First, information overload can make people feel anxious and powerless: scientists have discovered that multitaskers produce more stress hormones. Second, overload can reduce creativity. Teresa Amabile of Harvard Business School has spent more than a decade studying the work habits of 238 people, collecting a total of 12,000 diary entries between them. She finds that focus and creativity are connected. People are more likely to be creative if they are allowed to focus on something for some time without interruptions. If constantly interrupted or forced to attend meetings, they are less likely to be creative. Third, overload can also make workers less productive. David Meyer, of the University of Michigan, has shown that people who complete certain tasks in parallel take much longer and make many more errors than people who complete the same tasks in sequence.
via Schumpeter: Too much information | The Economist.
