rePost :: Heritage Health Prize: Is $3 million enough to improve the U.S. health care system? – By Annie Lowrey – Slate Magazine

Wish I could join a team trying to win this.

“We often find the winners come from electrical engineering and physics,” explains founder and CEO Anthony Goldbloom. “Theyre common-sense disciplines, where people are used to problem-solving. Rather than spending time on questions like Should I be using this algorithm or this system? and What outcomes are we looking for? the engineers and physicists just try to answer the question.”The size of the kitty should pull in quality teams—Heritage says it expects scores of competitors. The question surely seems answerable. But there are concerns that remain. For instance, Goldbloom says that Heritage and Kaggle have worked hard to ensure that the people behind the data set remain anonymous. It seems like an outlandish possibility. But de-anonymization has killed prizes before. Netflix, for instance, pulled its second $1 million public competition after computer scientists figured out who some of the users in the data set were. Goldbloom is working with Canadian researchers who specialize in keeping health information private, as well as with one of the computer scientists who cracked the Netflix prize, to test the data set.But on the first day of the two-year competition, everyone was optimistic. “Im hoping that people will be attracted [to the contest] intellectually and for the betterment of mankind,” Merkin says. “The only way families can have affordable health care is if we try to make the system a little more efficient.”Thats certainly a $3 million question.
via Heritage Health Prize: Is $3 million enough to improve the U.S. health care system? – By Annie Lowrey – Slate Magazine.

Singularity Watch:Stephen Hawking: "Humans Have Entered a New Stage of Evolution"

Although It has taken homo sapiens several million years to evolve from the apes, the useful information in our DNA, has probably changed by only a few million bits. So the rate of biological evolution in humans, Stephen Hawking points out in his Life in the Universe lecture, is about a bit a year.
“By contrast,” Hawking says, “there are about 50,000 new books published in the English language each year, containing of the order of a hundred billion bits of information. Of course, the great majority of this information is garbage, and no use to any form of life. But, even so, the rate at which useful information can be added is millions, if not billions, higher than with DNA.”
via Stephen Hawking: “Humans Have Entered a New Stage of Evolution”.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]