Learned Today::Innovation's Accidental Enemies – BusinessWeek

Abductive logic, Logic of what could be. I like the sound of that!!!

Does that mean we are doomed to live in world devoid of proof—that innovation must be consigned to a realm of cross-our-fingers hopefulness? No, it’s not so bleak. Instead, when facing an anomalous situation, we can turn to a third form of logic: abductive logic, the logic of what could be. To use abduction, we need to creatively assemble the disparate experiences and bits of data that seem relevant in order to make an inference—a logical leap—to the best possible conclusion.
via Innovation’s Accidental Enemies – BusinessWeek.

rePost::Chris Daly's Blog: How the Lawyers Stole Winter: Thoughts on journalism and journalism history.

Saw a pointer to this essay from Doc Searls blog.
I mourn for the children of today. Parents seemingly scared or maybe not wanting to appear as Not Good Parents and thus over compensate. If you are scared about life, I believe you shouldn’t make it such that you raise a bunch of risk averse people. This is why progress is very slow. I used to be very risk averse. I didn’t want to mess things up. This attribute made me learn much much slowly (with respect to programming). The discovery of dynamic languages helped me gain confidence in breaking systems. This is why 2007 me is very different 2010 me (wrt to programming and most other things). I now think that ask for forgiveness later.  Hope I can apply this to different parts of my life. Fake courage. Fail. Learn.Live!!!

But before we could play, we had to check the ice. We became serious junior meteorologists, true connoisseurs of cold. We learned that the best weather for pond skating is plain, clear cold, with starry nights and no snow. (Snow not only mucks up the skating surface but also insulates the ice from the colder air above.) And we learned that moving water, even the gently flowing Mystic River, is a lot less likely to freeze than standing water. So we skated only on the pond. We learned all the weird whooping and cracking sounds that ice makes as it expands and contracts, and thus when to leave the ice.
Do kids learn these things today? I don't know. How would they? We don't even let them. Instead, we post signs. Ruled by lawyers, cities and towns everywhere try to eliminate their legal liability. But try as they might, they cannot eliminate the underlying risk. Liability is a social construct; risk is a natural fact. When it is cold enough, ponds freeze. No sign or fence or ordinance can change that.
In fact, by focusing on liability and not teaching our kids how to take risks, we are making their world more dangerous. When we were children, we had to learn to evaluate risks and handle them on our own. We had to learn, quite literally, to test the waters. As a result, we grew up to be more savvy about ice and ponds than any kid could be who has skated only under adult supervision on a rink.
via Chris Daly’s Blog: How the Lawyers Stole Winter: Thoughts on journalism and journalism history..

rePost::Google's two-way search is good for the web. (Scripting News)

basically you have a google profile that you can edit and it helps google personalize the search.
I’ve edited my profile, I believe yesterday or the day before that, hope you can too!

Wednesday, February 03, 2010 by Dave Winer.

WIthout any fanfare as far as I can tell, Google has unveiled one of the most signficant, far-reaching and basically good features in its core search product.  Permalink to this paragraph
Now, in addition to presenting the pages ranked in order of algorithmic importance, it also shows you what people you know have to say about the subject.  Permalink to this paragraph
How does it know who you know? Based on some very simple information you may have entered into your Google profile. (I called this two-way search in July 2009.) Permalink to this paragraph
via Google’s two-way search is good for the web. (Scripting News).

rePost::Seth's Blog: Hunters and Farmers

This is an interesting perspective. Though I’ve been very wary of Evolutionary Psychology/Neurology/Anything concerning the brain, I am drawn to this idea.  I believe this is another form of the more nuanced view in the book by probably 5th most favorite TED talk speaker sir Ken Robinson (ted Talk here) . I embedded the talk at the end of this post. Hope you can read his book The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything.

Clearly, farming is a very different activity from hunting. Farmers spend time sweating the details, worrying about the weather, making smart choices about seeds and breeding and working hard to avoid a bad crop. Hunters, on the other hand, have long periods of distracted noticing interrupted by brief moments of frenzied panic.
It’s not crazy to imagine that some people are better at one activity than another. There might even be a gulf between people who are good at each of the two skills. Thom Hartmann has written extensively on this. He points out that medicating kids who might be better at hunting so that they can sit quietly in a school designed to teach farming doesn’t make a lot of sense.
A kid who has innate hunting skills is easily distracted, because noticing small movements in the brush is exactly what you’d need to do if you were hunting. Scan and scan and pounce. That same kid is able to drop everything and focus like a laser–for a while–if it’s urgent. The farming kid, on the other hand, is particularly good at tilling the fields of endless homework problems, each a bit like the other. Just don’t ask him to change gears instantly.
Marketers confuse the two groups. Are you selling a product that helps farmers… and hoping that hunters will buy it? How do you expect that people will discover your product, or believe that it will help them? The woman who reads each issue of Vogue, hurrying through the pages then clicking over to Zappos to overnight order the latest styles–she’s hunting. Contrast this to the CTO who spends six months issuing RFPs to buy a PBX that was last updated three years ago… she’s farming.
via Seth’s Blog: Hunters and Farmers.

rePost:: Coordination Is Hard :: Overcoming Bias

Robin Hanson is really one of those people who is a joy to read for the sheer idea/word count ratio.
Subscribe to his blog Overcoming Bias. It’s tagged as Essential Reading in my Google Reader.
When people complain about Government , they seem to forget this.
That governance is hard.
That governance is like a green marine on his first training run in full 20kg packs running uphill hard.
This is why for someone to be able to govern well he has to have some of these things:

  • Natural curiosity.
  • A sense of who to trust.
  • An understanding of the Major Issues facing the Philippines.
  • A group of people he/she trust and worthy of that trust.
  • A lack of a reality distortion field or an ability to go in and out of that field.

In a sense I’ve felt that Gordon, Gibo and Noy has equal footing on everything except the last 2.

The key thing to understand is: governance is hard, especially in a democracy. Fundamentally, this is because coordination is hard.
It can be very hard for even a single owner to coordinate with a dozen subordinates that each coordinate with a dozen employees in an ordinary firm to achieve a simple clear goal like making and selling a simple product at a profit. Organizations fail at this task all the time, and for thousands of different reasons. Most new organizations attempting this fail, and most that are succeeding now will fail in a few decades. When they fail, they will fail so badly that it will not be worth trying to save them; better to throw them away and start anew.
….
Types of government activities vary both in how valuable are their possible impacts, and it how difficult is their coordination task (both relative to private coordination and to doing nothing).  If your politics were about policy, and you were reasonable, then you’d support programs with high value impacts and easy coordination, and oppose programs with low value impacts and difficult coordination.  Ideologues who oppose all government programs no matter how valuable or easy, or who support all programs with laudable goals no matter now difficult their coordination task just don’t get it.  That might signal their values and blind faith or hatred in leaders, but not their reason.
via Overcoming Bias : Coordination Is Hard.

rePost::Natalie Portman's lesbian terror | ABS-CBN News Online Beta

Promise, I wouldn’t watch it just for the liplock. ehehe.

Natalie Portman was “terrified” when she had to kiss Mila Kunis in her new movie “Black Swan.”
The actress has a steamy same-sex scene with the “Max Payne” star in the supernatural thriller and admits she struggled to overcome her nerves before locking lips with another lady.
She said: “I was terrified. At the moment I lived in a state of inner terror.”
Portman – who previously shot a nude scene for short film 'Hotel Chevalier' – is also worried the lesbian sex sequence is overshadowing the plot of the film and worries it will make her be taken less seriously as an actress.
She added: “Nudity is something absolutely natural and I'm not prudish – but in a film it can be distracting. Doing 'Black Swan' I couldn't say no. The project is a huge opportunity for me to show a new me. I can't always play the nice mothers. My other problem is that single pictures are being taken out of context and put on the internet.”
via Natalie Portman’s lesbian terror | ABS-CBN News Online Beta.

Quote::TheMoneyIllusion » Seeing the world in a different way (one year later)

I loved reading this, thanks to Marginal Revolution’s Tyler Cowen for the pointer!!! (Trying his best to impersonate famous blogger’s tone)

Still, at the current pace my blog is gradually swallowing my life. Soon I won’t be able to get anything else done. And I really don’t get any support from Bentley, as far as I know the higher ups don’t even know I have a blog. So I just did 2500 hours of uncompensated labor. I hope someone got some value out of it. Right now I just want my life back.
via TheMoneyIllusion » Seeing the world in a different way (one year later).

rePost::Liquid glass will change your life, eliminate detergent profits Boing Boing

Hope this takes of would love to spray this on my shoes.  But think what would happen to a lot of the for CSI type of evidence that is gathered?

Liquid glass will change your life, eliminate detergent profits
A Turko-German consortium has announced a liquid glass product “that will revolutionize everything” (it's a “new kind of glass,” as Mr Wolfram might put it). Seriously, it sounds like the applications for this stuff are endless, and yes, that's what everyone said about aerogel and the Segway, but maybe this time… They're shipping to the UK soon, but “many supermarkets, may be unwilling to stock the products because they make enormous profits from cleaning products that need to be replaced regularly, and liquid glass would make virtually all of them obsolete.”
Goddammit, Big Detergent is screwing up my future again!
Spray-on liquid glass is transparent, non-toxic, and can protect virtually any surface against almost any damage from hazards such as water, UV radiation, dirt, heat, and bacterial infections. The coating is also flexible and breathable, which makes it suitable for use on an enormous array of products.
via Liquid glass will change your life, eliminate detergent profits Boing Boing.