rePost::Experimental Theology: The Way, the Truth and the Life

Nice way to think about this!!!

Jesus said he was “the way, the truth and the life.”
For many Christians, where faith has been reduced to propositional assent (“I believe x to be true”), Jesus’ claim moves through the following sequence:

Truth-Life-Way

That is, we have the following order:

  1. Truth: I believe in Jesus
  2. Life: Because of this belief I get to go to heaven
  3. Way: And maybe, but this doesn’t always happen, I’ll begin to live more like Jesus

What I was arguing for in the last post was this kind of sequence. A reversal of the traditional order:

Way-Life-Truth

Things go in this order:

  1. Way: I begin to follow the path of Jesus
  2. Life: I discover that in losing my life I find it
  3. Truth: And maybe, but this doesn’t always happen, I’ll begin to believe the claims about Jesus to be true

via Experimental Theology: The Way, the Truth and the Life.

Learned Today:Income Mobility My ASS:Born Poor? | Santa Fe Reporter

Again with the numbers:
30
32
The first number is the likelihood, expressed as a percentage, that a child born to parents whose incomes fall within the top 10 percent of Americans will grow up to be at least as wealthy.
The second is the percentage likelihood that a person born into the bottom 10 percent of society will stay at the bottom.
Just to drive the point home, here’s a third number: 1.3
That’s the percentage likelihood that a bottom 10 percenter will ever make it to the top 10 percent. For 99 out of 100 people, rags never lead to riches.
via Born Poor? | Santa Fe Reporter.

rePost::Born Poor? | Santa Fe Reporter

“Inequality,” she says, “really holds us back.”
Bowles offers a key reason why this is so. “Inequality breeds conflict, and conflict breeds wasted resources,” he says.
In short, in a very unequal society, the people at the top have to spend a lot of time and energy keeping the lower classes obedient and productive.
Inequality leads to an excess of what Bowles calls “guard labor.” In a 2007 paper on the subject, he and co-author Arjun Jayadev, an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts, make an astonishing claim: Roughly 1 in 4 Americans is employed to keep fellow citizens in line and protect private wealth from would-be Robin Hoods.
The job descriptions of guard labor range from “imposing work discipline”—think of the corporate IT spies who keep desk jockeys from slacking off online—to enforcing laws, like the officers in the Santa Fe Police Department paddy wagon parked outside of Walmart.
The greater the inequalities in a society, the more guard labor it requires, Bowles finds. This holds true among US states, with relatively unequal states like New Mexico employing a greater share of guard labor than relatively egalitarian states like Wisconsin.
via Born Poor? | Santa Fe Reporter.

Learned Today::Innovation's Accidental Enemies – BusinessWeek

Abductive logic, Logic of what could be. I like the sound of that!!!

Does that mean we are doomed to live in world devoid of proof—that innovation must be consigned to a realm of cross-our-fingers hopefulness? No, it’s not so bleak. Instead, when facing an anomalous situation, we can turn to a third form of logic: abductive logic, the logic of what could be. To use abduction, we need to creatively assemble the disparate experiences and bits of data that seem relevant in order to make an inference—a logical leap—to the best possible conclusion.
via Innovation’s Accidental Enemies – BusinessWeek.

Quote::Innovation's Accidental Enemies – BusinessWeek

When faced with a new idea, the boardroom impulse is to ask for proof in one of two flavors: deductive and inductive. With deduction, we apply a widely held rule. With induction, we develop a new rule from a wide range of data. In both cases, we use existing information to understand the issue in play. But for breakthroughs, there is no rule or pool of past data to provide certainty. So when a CEO, like our banker friend, demands evidence that an idea will succeed, he is driving innovation away.
via Innovation’s Accidental Enemies – BusinessWeek.

rePost::Chris Daly's Blog: How the Lawyers Stole Winter: Thoughts on journalism and journalism history.

Saw a pointer to this essay from Doc Searls blog.
I mourn for the children of today. Parents seemingly scared or maybe not wanting to appear as Not Good Parents and thus over compensate. If you are scared about life, I believe you shouldn’t make it such that you raise a bunch of risk averse people. This is why progress is very slow. I used to be very risk averse. I didn’t want to mess things up. This attribute made me learn much much slowly (with respect to programming). The discovery of dynamic languages helped me gain confidence in breaking systems. This is why 2007 me is very different 2010 me (wrt to programming and most other things). I now think that ask for forgiveness later.  Hope I can apply this to different parts of my life. Fake courage. Fail. Learn.Live!!!

But before we could play, we had to check the ice. We became serious junior meteorologists, true connoisseurs of cold. We learned that the best weather for pond skating is plain, clear cold, with starry nights and no snow. (Snow not only mucks up the skating surface but also insulates the ice from the colder air above.) And we learned that moving water, even the gently flowing Mystic River, is a lot less likely to freeze than standing water. So we skated only on the pond. We learned all the weird whooping and cracking sounds that ice makes as it expands and contracts, and thus when to leave the ice.
Do kids learn these things today? I don't know. How would they? We don't even let them. Instead, we post signs. Ruled by lawyers, cities and towns everywhere try to eliminate their legal liability. But try as they might, they cannot eliminate the underlying risk. Liability is a social construct; risk is a natural fact. When it is cold enough, ponds freeze. No sign or fence or ordinance can change that.
In fact, by focusing on liability and not teaching our kids how to take risks, we are making their world more dangerous. When we were children, we had to learn to evaluate risks and handle them on our own. We had to learn, quite literally, to test the waters. As a result, we grew up to be more savvy about ice and ponds than any kid could be who has skated only under adult supervision on a rink.
via Chris Daly’s Blog: How the Lawyers Stole Winter: Thoughts on journalism and journalism history..

rePost::Google's two-way search is good for the web. (Scripting News)

basically you have a google profile that you can edit and it helps google personalize the search.
I’ve edited my profile, I believe yesterday or the day before that, hope you can too!

Wednesday, February 03, 2010 by Dave Winer.

WIthout any fanfare as far as I can tell, Google has unveiled one of the most signficant, far-reaching and basically good features in its core search product.  Permalink to this paragraph
Now, in addition to presenting the pages ranked in order of algorithmic importance, it also shows you what people you know have to say about the subject.  Permalink to this paragraph
How does it know who you know? Based on some very simple information you may have entered into your Google profile. (I called this two-way search in July 2009.) Permalink to this paragraph
via Google’s two-way search is good for the web. (Scripting News).