{"id":2741,"date":"2010-01-08T12:32:26","date_gmt":"2010-01-08T17:32:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/onthe8spot.com\/?p=2741"},"modified":"2010-01-08T12:32:26","modified_gmt":"2010-01-08T17:32:26","slug":"repostnorman-borlaug-michael-jackson-and-the-invisible-hand-angry-bear","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/onthe8spot.com\/index.php\/2010\/01\/08\/repostnorman-borlaug-michael-jackson-and-the-invisible-hand-angry-bear\/","title":{"rendered":"rePost::Norman Borlaug, Michael Jackson, and the Invisible Hand | Angry Bear"},"content":{"rendered":"

But there is another problem which seems to be less highly recognized, namely that the whole concept of the Invisible Hand<\/a> itself is bull$#^&. As an example, I’m writing this a few minutes after reading about the death<\/a> of Norman Borlaug<\/a>. He was a Nobel Laureate<\/a> who developed disease-resistant and fast growing crops. Depending on who you ask, his work saved the lives of somewhere between a quarter of a billion and a billion people. So far. If we don’t all die in some sort of cataclysm in the next fifteen minutes, that number will only grow.
\nNow consider another person recently deceased – Michael Jackson<\/a>. I believe Jackson was finally buried some time last week. Aside from being known the world over, Jackson was very wealthy, despite his clear incompetence with money. He probably made at least one dollar for every life saved by Norman Borlaug, so far. Norman Borlaug, on the other hand, to the best of my knowledge<\/a>, did not. Furthermore, this discrepancy in income is very, very, very hard to attribute to government<\/a> interference.
\nWhich means, there are two possible alternatives:
\n1. Michael Jackson did more positive things for the world than Norman Borlaug.
\n2. Michael Jackson did less positive things for the world than Norman Borlaug.
\nThere is no third option. None. Now, I think very, very few people, even die-hard Michael Jackson fans, when presented with numbers like “a quarter of a billion lives saved so far” would agree with option 1. Which leaves option 2. And if option 2, then the Invisible Hand is bull$#^&. Which means capitalism<\/a> doesn’t work or is immoral. That does not imply any other philosophical system would work better, mind you, but trusting the market to do its thing provides perverse results.
\nvia Norman Borlaug, Michael Jackson, and the Invisible Hand | Angry Bear<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I’m cleaning house. I wanted to post this last year but forgot about it.<\/p>\n

\"Reblog<\/a>