{"id":1790,"date":"2009-09-15T20:39:20","date_gmt":"2009-09-16T01:39:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/onthe8spot.com\/?p=1790"},"modified":"2009-09-15T20:39:20","modified_gmt":"2009-09-16T01:39:20","slug":"learned-todaythe-answer-sheet-willingham-student-learning-styles-theory-is-bunk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/onthe8spot.com\/index.php\/2009\/09\/15\/learned-todaythe-answer-sheet-willingham-student-learning-styles-theory-is-bunk\/","title":{"rendered":"Learned Today::The Answer Sheet – Willingham: Student "Learning Styles" Theory Is Bunk"},"content":{"rendered":"

I use to believe in the Learning Styles theory, but based on my sample of One (me), You learn when you need to and\/or you want to , when these are both true you really learn, when only one is true you tend to have incomplete learning<\/a> on a subject matter.<\/p>\n

This is not to say that all kids are the same, or that all kids should be taught the same way. But it does help us to understand what the source of these differences might be.
\nConsider this analogy<\/a>. Watch kids on a museum<\/a> field trip<\/a> and you\u2019ll notice that they stop to look at different paintings<\/a>: some like cubism, some like impressionism, some like the Old Masters<\/a>, and so on.
\nYou would not conclude that these kids have different visual systems. You\u2019d figure that these differences were due to the children<\/a>\u2019s backgrounds, their personalities, tastes, and so on.
\nThe same seems to be true of learning.
\nSome lessons click with one child and not with another, but not because of an enduring bias or predisposition in the way the child learns. The lesson clicks or doesn\u2019t because of the knowledge the child brought to the lesson, his interests, or other factors.
\nWhen you think about it, the theory of learning styles doesn\u2019t really celebrate the differences among children: On the contrary, the point is to categorize kids.
\nvia The Answer Sheet – Willingham: Student “Learning Styles” Theory Is Bunk<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"Reblog<\/a>